๐Ÿงช LiDAR SR Research Report

๐Ÿ“Š Executive Summary

Applied a Deep Learning SR (Super-Resolution) algorithm to low-channel (8ch) LiDAR data, dramatically reducing errors and restoring structural details compared to high-channel (128ch) Teacher data.

Mean Absolute Error (MAE)
โ–ผ 68.4%
14.12m โ†’ 4.49m (Overall Avg)
Cosine Similarity
โ–ฒ 41.2%
0.61 โ†’ 0.87 (Structural Fidelity)
Long-Range (>100m) Recovery
99.1%
High consistency with Teacher
Angular Stability (Std Dev)
0.05
Uniform performance across all angles

๐Ÿ“‰ Distance-wise MAE Reduction

Significant reduction in MAE observed across all ranges (0-100m+). Notably, error at ranges over 100m dropped from 12.18m to 1.75m.

๐Ÿ”— Structural Similarity Enhancement

Cosine Similarity reached above 0.8 across all bins, indicating successful Object Shape Restoration beyond simple distance correction.

๐ŸŽฏ Performance Improvement (Radar View)

๐Ÿ“ Qualitative Analysis (Key Cases)

Case 1: Short-Range (0-30m)

Scenario: Near-field objects & ground reflection.
Result: Restored point density where raw 8ch was too sparse for identification.
MAE: 0.1292 โ†’ 0.0387 (โ–ผ70%)

Case 2: Mid-Range (30-60m)

Scenario: Standard driving zone. Vehicle/Pedestrian detection.
Result: Suppressed line-break artifacts; sharpened object contours.
Sim: 0.817 โ†’ 0.942 (โ–ฒ15%)

Case 3: Long-Range (60-100m)

Scenario: Sensor limit zone with minimal points.
Result: Effectively inferred missing spatial information based on learned patterns.
MAE: 0.1306 โ†’ 0.0346 (โ–ผ73%)

Case 4: Ultra Long-Range (100m+)

Scenario: Sparse data near noise level.
Result: Reconstructed distribution highly similar to Teacher data.
Sim: 0.847 โ†’ 0.991 (โ–ฒ17%)